
Better measurement of ESG factors is important. But it’s not enough. We can’t afford to wait for perfect measurement before taking other action.
Better measurement of ESG factors is important. But it’s not enough. We can’t afford to wait for perfect measurement before taking other action.
With SFDR starting to take effect from March 2021, ESG policy is top of mind for many investment firms. Collie ESG provides review and development services to help firms get ready.
This post links to an article in the latest edition of IPE, in which I set out some the key challenges around ESG reporting.
If an ESG program is to be more than a bolt-on, there has to be a genuine connection to the investment proposition of the firm. An asset management firm must ask itself: how does ESG relate to how we invest?
Investment firms cannot chase after every potentially interesting ESG idea. Judgment is needed about where to focus.
An asset management ESG policy should rest on three pillars: a sense of purpose, a demarcation of the limits of materiality, and a connection to the investment proposition of the firm. In this post, I look at the first of these: purpose.
ESG is in the midst of a transition from the periphery to the mainstream, driven by a number of mutually-reinforcing factors. This subject is not going away.
This post links to comments submitted to the US Department of Labor regarding their proposed update to the treatment of ESG considerations in selecting plan investments
Sustainability is a difficult, messy, ill-defined, fast-changing, real-life challenge. And it’s where the real investment process development is happening.